Agaric Acid Analysis Essay

1. Introduction

Herbal medicines, which are also referred to as phytomedicines or botanical medicines, have played a critical role in world health for thousands of years. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), “herbal medicines include herbs, herbal materials, herbal preparations and finished herbal products, that contain as active ingredients parts of plants, or other plant materials, or combinations” [1].

Over the last decade, the use of herbal medicines has expanded across the globe and gained considerable popularity. As a result of cultural and historical influences, herbal medicines remain an important part of the healthcare system in China, India, and Africa [2,3,4]. In recent years, the utilization of herbal medicines as complementary therapy has become more common in developed countries that have a typically well-established health care system structure [5,6]. According to the WHO, over 100 million Europeans currently use Traditional and Complementary Medicine (T&CM), and one-fifth among them regularly using T&CM for health care. It has been shown that there are many more T&CM users in Africa, Asia, Australia, and North America [7].

With increasing expansion in herbal medicine use globally, the quality control mechanisms surrounding the herbal medicines have become the main concern for both health authorities and the public. In the case of herbal medicines, contamination is critical to monitor, as toxicities related to extrinsic factors that are typically associated with undesirable toxic substances, rather than the herbs themselves, can result. In particular, fungal/microbial contamination has been a global concern for decades. According to prior investigations, toxigenic fungi species that are generated from soil or plants themselves can result in contamination of herbal medicines. These toxigenic fungi include species belonging to Aspergillus, Penicillium, Fusarium, and Alternaria genera [8,9,10]. Under unfavorable environmental conditions, these fungi produce mycotoxins, which are secondary metabolites that could contaminate various plants when in the field or at any stage during the collection, handling, transportation, or storage of the plants (e.g., mycotoxin contamination produced by Fusarium species can occur in the field and build up during the harvesting and drying stage, while additional toxins mainly produced by Penicillium and Aspergillus species can contaminate in storage operation) [11]. Reports regarding mycotoxin contamination screening of medicinal herbs and related products demonstrate that aflatoxins (AFs), ochratoxins, fumonisins (FBs), trichothecenes, and zearalenones (ZENs) are found to be the most commonly contaminated ones [12,13] (Table 1). These mycotoxins were identified to be carcinogenic, teratogenic, and mutagenic. In addition, they were also found to harm live cells, kidney, reproductive system, immune system, and central nervous system [14]. Among all the known mycotoxins, the most toxic one is aflatoxin B1 (AFB1). It was classified as a Group-1 carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) due to its strong toxicity [15], and represents the main threat worldwide.

Currently, numerous published reviews reported the occurrence of mycotoxin contamination in herbal materials and related products. These reports indicated that mycotoxin contamination in herbal medicines is considered a global issue, particularly in the case of developing countries [16,33,34,35,36,37,38,39] (Figure 1). To date, more than 40 mycotoxins have been detected in herbal medicines [12,13,40]. The typical examples of these mycotoxins are shown in Table 1. In addition to the toxicity effects of mycotoxins themselves, the presence of mycotoxins in herbal medicines may also function to decrease the medicinal potency, lead to drug interactions, and potentiate adverse effects that could influence the safety of these herbal remedies [41].

Due to the hazardous effects associated with mycotoxins, approximately 100 countries implemented specific limits for the presence of mycotoxins in foodstuffs and feedstuffs by the end of 2003 [42]. National regulations have been established for numerous mycotoxins, including the naturally occurring AFs and aflatoxin M1 (AFM1), the trichothecenes deoxynivalenol (DON), diacetoxyscirpenol (DAS), T-2 toxin (T-2) and HT-2 toxin (HT-2), fumonisin B1, B2 and B3 (FB1, FB2 and FB3), agaric acid, ergot alkaloids (EA), ochratoxin A (OTA), patulin (PAT), phomopsins, sterigmatocystin (ST) and ZEN [42]. However, in the case of medicinal plants, official regulations regarding the presence of only AFs and OTA in medicinal herbs are shared globally in pharmacopoeias, national, and organizational regulations. In general, the current legal limit for AFB1 in herbal medicines ranges between 2 and 10 μg kg−1, while the limit for combined aflatoxin B1, G1, B2 and G2 (total AFs) ranges from 4 to 20 μg kg−1, and the limit for OTA ranges from 15 to 80 μg kg−1, as depicted in Table 2.

In regard to AFs, the European Union (EU) has set a limit of 5 μg kg−1 for AFB1 and 10 μg kg−1 for total AFs in nutmeg, ginger, turmeric, and pepper [43]. However, the European Pharmacopeia (EP) has implemented stricter limits for the presence of AF in herbal drugs, with the limits set to 2 μg kg−1 for AFB1 and 4 μg kg−1 for total AFs [44]. The same limit is set for the presence of AF in herbal drugs, which was set by the British Pharmacopeia (BP) [45]. Germany has implemented a limit of 2 μg kg−1 for AFB1 and 4 μg kg−1 for total AFs in any materials that are used in manufacturing of medicinal products (including medicinal herbal products) [46]. In the USA, a limit of 5 μg kg−1 has been implemented for AFB1 and 20 μg kg−1 for total AFs was established by the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) for certain types of raw medicinal herb materials, as well as their powder and/or dry extract [47,48]. Identical limits have been set by Argentina for herbs, herbal materials, and herbal preparations that are used in herbal tea infusions [46]. In addition, Canada has implemented the same legislation regarding products that contain ginseng or any substance derived from this source, including evening primrose oil, sugar cane, sugar beets, and cottonseed [49]. In China, a total of nineteen different types of traditional Chinese medicines (TCMs) medicinal herbs are regulated in order to detect AF, with the limits being 5 μg kg−1 for AFB1 and 10 μg kg−1 for total AFs. In order to regulate AF levels [50], South Korea has also established limits of 10 μg kg−1 for AFB1 and 15 μg kg−1 for total AFs in sixteen types of medicinal herbs [51]. Japan has set a limit of 10 μg kg−1 for total AFs in crude drugs as well as preparations containing crude drugs as the primary ingredient (crude drug preparations) [52]. Indonesia has set a legislative limit of 20 μg kg−1 for total AFs in the category of “coconut, spices and traditional drug medicines/herbs” [42]. In Vietnam, limits of 5 μg kg−1 for AFB1 and 10 μg kg−1 for total AFs have been implemented for dry white and black pepper, nutmeg, ginger, and turmeric [53]. Compared with AF, only few countries or organizations, such as Vietnam [53] and the EU [43], have established a maximum residue level (MRL) for OTA in nutmeg, ginger, turmeric, black and white pepper, liquorice root and its extract, with the legislative limit varying from 15 μg kg−1 to 80 μg kg−1.

In order to satisfy the requirements of the recent legislation and to protect consumer health, it is imperative that sensitive methods be developed for mycotoxin analysis. The development of accurate and rapid methods for the determination of mycotoxin levels in herbal medicines remains a challenging task due to the trace level of mycotoxin, as well as the involvement of an extremely complicated matrix. Therefore, in contrast to the analytical technology that is utilized in general food and feed, methods for medicinal herbs typically require modification along with characters of different types of matrixes, which are primarily embodied in the sample preparation. Numerous reviews have focused on the occurrence of mycotoxins in herbal medicine [16,33,54,55,56,57]; however few provided detailed summaries of the development of the analytical methods utilized for mycotoxin determination. A previous review reported by our group in 2012 focused on the development of mycotoxin detection methods in TCMs [58]. In recent years, the application of biotechnology and nanotechnology has greatly pushed the analytical techniques forward. Here, this review thoroughly summarizes the advances and progress of the analytical methods from sampling, pretreatment to detection of mycotoxin contamination in herbal medicines. In addition, we review the recent development of screening assays used for mycotoxin detection in herbal medicines.

Amanita muscaria, commonly known as the fly agaric or fly amanita, is a basidiomycetemushroom, one of many in the genus Amanita. It is also a muscimol mushroom. Native throughout the temperate and boreal regions of the Northern Hemisphere, Amanita muscaria has been unintentionally introduced to many countries in the Southern Hemisphere, generally as a symbiont with pine and birch plantations, and is now a true cosmopolitan species. It associates with various deciduous and coniferous trees.

Arguably the most iconic toadstool species, the fly agaric is a large white-gilled, white-spotted, usually red mushroom, and is one of the most recognisable and widely encountered in popular culture.

Although classified as poisonous, reports of human deaths resulting from its ingestion are extremely rare. After parboiling—which weakens its toxicity and breaks down the mushroom's psychoactive substances—it is eaten in parts of Europe, Asia, and North America. Amanita muscaria is noted for its hallucinogenic properties, with its main psychoactive constituents being the compounds ibotenic acid and muscimol. The mushroom was used as an intoxicant and entheogen by the peoples of Siberia, and has a religious significance in these cultures. There has been much speculation on possible traditional use of this mushroom as an intoxicant in other places such as the Middle East, Eurasia, North America, and Scandinavia.

Taxonomy and naming[edit]

The name of the mushroom in many European languages is thought to be derived from its use as an insecticide when sprinkled in milk. This practice has been recorded from Germanic- and Slavic-speaking parts of Europe, as well as the Vosges region and pockets elsewhere in France, and Romania.[5]:198Albertus Magnus was the first to record it in his work De vegetabilibus some time before 1256,[6] commenting vocatur fungus muscarum, eo quod in lacte pulverizatus interficit muscas, "it is called the fly mushroom because it is powdered in milk to kill flies."[7]

The 16th-century Flemish botanist Carolus Clusius traced the practice of sprinkling it into milk to Frankfurt in Germany,[8] while Carl Linnaeus, the "father of taxonomy", reported it from Småland in southern Sweden, where he had lived as a child.[9] He described it in volume two of his Species Plantarum in 1753, giving it the name Agaricus muscarius,[10] the specific epithet deriving from Latinmusca meaning "fly".[11] It gained its current name in 1783, when placed in the genus Amanita by Jean-Baptiste Lamarck, a name sanctioned in 1821 by the "father of mycology", Swedish naturalist Elias Magnus Fries. The starting date for all the mycota had been set by general agreement as January 1, 1821, the date of Fries's work, and so the full name was then Amanita muscaria (L.:Fr.) Hook. The 1987 edition of the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature changed the rules on the starting date and primary work for names of fungi, and names can now be considered valid as far back as May 1, 1753, the date of publication of Linnaeus's work.[12] Hence, Linnaeus and Lamarck are now taken as the namers of Amanita muscaria (L.) Lam..

The English mycologist John Ramsbottom reported that Amanita muscaria was used for getting rid of bugs in England and Sweden, and bug agaric was an old alternate name for the species.[7] French mycologist Pierre Bulliard reported having tried without success to replicate its fly-killing properties in his work Histoire des plantes vénéneuses et suspectes de la France (1784), and proposed a new binomial name Agaricus pseudo-aurantiacus because of this.[5]:200 One compound isolated from the fungus is 1,3-diolein ( 1,3-Di(cis-9-octadecenoyl)glycerol), which attracts insects.[13] It has been hypothesised that the flies intentionally seek out the fly agaric for its intoxicating properties.[14] An alternative derivation proposes that the term fly- refers not to insects as such but rather the delirium resulting from consumption of the fungus. This is based on the medieval belief that flies could enter a person's head and cause mental illness.[15] Several regional names appear to be linked with this connotation, meaning the "mad" or "fool's" version of the highly regarded edible mushroom Amanita caesarea. Hence there is oriol foll "mad oriol" in Catalan, mujolo folo from Toulouse, concourlo fouolo from the Aveyron department in Southern France, ovolo matto from Trentino in Italy. A local dialect name in Fribourg in Switzerland is tsapi de diablhou, which translates as "Devil's hat".[5]:194

Classification[edit]

Amanita muscaria is the type species of the genus. By extension, it is also the type species of AmanitasubgenusAmanita, as well as section Amanita within this subgenus. Amanita subgenus Amanita includes all Amanita with inamyloid spores. AmanitasectionAmanita includes the species which have very patchy universal veil remnants, including a volva that is reduced to a series of concentric rings and the veil remnants on the cap to a series of patches or warts. Most species in this group also have a bulbous base.[16][17]Amanita section Amanita consists of A. muscaria and its close relatives, including A. pantherina (the panther cap), A. gemmata, A. farinosa, and A. xanthocephala.[18] Modern fungal taxonomists have classified Amanita muscaria and its allies this way based on gross morphology and spore inamyloidy. Two recent molecular phylogenetic studies have confirmed this classification as natural.[19][20]

Controversy[edit]

Amanita muscaria varies considerably in its morphology, and many authorities recognize several subspecies or varieties within the species. In The Agaricales in Modern Taxonomy, German mycologist Rolf Singer listed three subspecies, though without description: A. muscaria ssp. muscaria, A. muscaria ssp. americana, and A. muscaria ssp. flavivolvata.[16]

However, a 2006 molecular phylogenetic study of different regional populations of A. muscaria by mycologist József Geml and colleagues found three distinct clades within this species representing, roughly, Eurasian, Eurasian "subalpine", and North American populations. Specimens belonging to all three clades have been found in Alaska; this has led to the hypothesis that this was the centre of diversification for this species. The study also looked at four named varieties of the species: var. alba, var. flavivolvata, var. formosa (including var. guessowii), and var. regalis from both areas. All four varieties were found within both the Eurasian and North American clades, evidence that these morphological forms are polymorphisms rather than distinct subspecies or varieties.[21] Further molecular study by Geml and colleagues published in 2008 show that these three genetic groups, plus a fourth associated with oak–hickory–pine forest in the southeastern United States and two more on Santa Cruz Island in California, are delineated from each other enough genetically to be considered separate species; thus A. muscaria as it stands currently is evidently a species complex.[22] The complex also includes at least three other closely related taxa that are currently regarded as species:[1]A. breckonii is a buff-capped mushroom associated with conifers from the Pacific Northwest,[23] and the brown-capped A. gioiosa and A. heterochroma from the Mediterranean Basin and from Sardinia respectively. Both of these last two are found with Eucalyptus and Cistus trees, and it is unclear whether they are native or introduced from Australia.[24][25]

Amanitaceae.org now only recognize three varieties but says that they will be segregated into their own taxa in the near future, the varieties are:[26]

ImageReference nameCommon nameSynonymDescription
Amanita muscaria var. flavivolvata[1]American fly agaricred, with yellow to yellowish-white warts. It is found from southern Alaska down through the Rocky Mountains, through Central America, all the way to Andean Colombia. Rodham Tulloss uses this name to describe all "typical" A. muscaria from indigenous New World populations.
Amanita muscaria var. guessowii[3]American fly agaric (yellow variant)Amanita muscaria var. formosahas a yellow to orange cap, with the centre more orange or perhaps even reddish orange. It is found most commonly in northeastern North America, from Newfoundland and Quebec south all the way to the state of Tennessee. Some authorities (cf. Jenkins) treat these populations as A. muscaria var. formosa, while others (cf. Tulloss) recognise them as a distinct variety.
Amanita muscaria var. inzengae[27]Inzenga's fly agaricit has a yellow to orange-yellow cap with yellowish warts and stem which may be tan.

Description[edit]

A large, conspicuous mushroom, Amanita muscaria is generally common and numerous where it grows, and is often found in groups with basidiocarps in all stages of development. Fly agaric fruiting bodies emerge from the soil looking like white eggs. After emerging from the ground, the cap is covered with numerous small white to yellow pyramid-shaped warts. These are remnants of the universal veil, a membrane that encloses the entire mushroom when it is still very young. Dissecting the mushroom at this stage will reveal a characteristic yellowish layer of skin under the veil; this is helpful in identification. As the fungus grows, the red colour appears through the broken veil and the warts become less prominent; they do not change in size, but are reduced relative to the expanding skin area. The cap changes from globose to hemispherical, and finally to plate-like and flat in mature specimens.[28] Fully grown, the bright red cap is usually around 8–20 cm (3–8 in) in diameter, although larger specimens have been found. The red colour may fade after rain and in older mushrooms.

The free gills are white, as is the spore print. The oval spores measure 9–13 by 6.5–9 μm; they do not turn blue with the application of iodine.[29] The stipe is white, 5–20 cm (2.0–7.9 in) high by 1–2 cm (0.5–1 in) wide, and has the slightly brittle, fibrous texture typical of many large mushrooms. At the base is a bulb that bears universal veil remnants in the form of two to four distinct rings or ruffs. Between the basal universal veil remnants and gills are remnants of the partial veil (which covers the gills during development) in the form of a white ring. It can be quite wide and flaccid with age. There is generally no associated smell other than a mild earthiness.[30][31]

Although very distinctive in appearance, the fly agaric has been mistaken for other yellow to red mushroom species in the Americas, such as Armillaria cf. mellea and the edible Amanita basii—a Mexican species similar to A. caesarea of Europe. Poison control centres in the U.S. and Canada have become aware that amarill (Spanish for 'yellow') is a common name for the A. caesarea-like species in Mexico.[4]Amanita caesarea can be distinguished by its entirely orange to red cap which lacks the numerous white warty spots of the fly agaric. Furthermore, the stem, gills and ring of A. caesarea are bright yellow, not white.[32] The volva is a distinct white bag, not broken into scales.[33] In Australia, the introduced fly agaric may be confused with the native vermilion grisette (Amanita xanthocephala), which grows in association with eucalypts. The latter species generally lacks the white warts of A. muscaria and bears no ring.[34]

Distribution and habitat[edit]

Amanita muscaria is a cosmopolitan mushroom, native to conifer and deciduous woodlands throughout the temperate and boreal regions of the Northern Hemisphere,[21] including higher elevations of warmer latitudes in regions such as Hindu Kush, the Mediterranean and also Central America. A recent molecular study proposes that it had an ancestral origin in the Siberian–Beringian region in the Tertiary period, before radiating outwards across Asia, Europe and North America.[21] The season for fruiting varies in different climates: fruiting occurs in summer and autumn across most of North America, but later in autumn and early winter on the Pacific coast. This species is often found in similar locations to Boletus edulis, and may appear in fairy rings.[35] Conveyed with pine seedlings, it has been widely transported into the southern hemisphere, including Australia,[36] New Zealand,[37] South Africa[38] and South America, where it can be found in the southern Brazilian states of Paraná[21] and Rio Grande do Sul.[39]

Ectomycorrhizal, Amanita muscaria forms symbiotic relationships with many trees, including pine, spruce, fir, birch, and cedar. Commonly seen under introduced trees,[40]A. muscaria is the fungal equivalent of a weed in New Zealand, Tasmania and Victoria, forming new associations with southern beech (Nothofagus).[41] The species is also invading a rainforest in Australia, where it may be displacing the native species.[40] It appears to be spreading northwards, with recent reports placing it near Port Macquarie on the New South Wales north coast.[42] It was recorded under silver birch (Betula pendula) in Manjimup, Western Australia in 2010.[43] Although it has apparently not spread to eucalypts in Australia, it has been recorded associating with them in Portugal.[44]

Toxicity[edit]

Amanita muscaria poisoning has occurred in young children and in people who ingested the mushrooms for a hallucinogenic experience.[15][45][46] Occasionally it has been ingested in error, because immature button forms resemble puffballs.[47] The white spots sometimes wash away during heavy rain and the mushrooms then may appear to be the edible A. caesarea.[48]

Amanita muscaria contains several biologically active agents, at least one of which, muscimol, is known to be psychoactive. Ibotenic acid, a neurotoxin, serves as a prodrug to muscimol, with approximately 10–20% converting to muscimol after ingestion. An active dose in adults is approximately 6 mg muscimol or 30 to 60 mg ibotenic acid;[49][50] this is typically about the amount found in one cap of Amanita muscaria.[51] The amount and ratio of chemical compounds per mushroom varies widely from region to region and season to season, which can further confuse the issue. Spring and summer mushrooms have been reported to contain up to 10 times more ibotenic acid and muscimol than autumn fruitings.[45]

A fatal dose has been calculated as 15 caps.[52] Deaths from this fungus A. muscaria have been reported in historical journal articles and newspaper reports,[53][54][55] but with modern medical treatment, fatal poisoning from ingesting this mushroom is extremely rare.[56] Many older books list Amanita muscaria as "deadly", but this is an error that implies the mushroom is more toxic than it is.[57] The North American Mycological Association has stated that there were: "no reliably documented cases of death from toxins in these mushrooms in the past 100 years".[58] The vast majority (90% or more) of mushroom poisoning deaths are from eating the greenish to yellowish "death cap", (A. phalloides) or perhaps even one of the three white Amanita species which are known as destroying angels,[59]A. virosa, A. bisporigera and A. ocreata.

The active constituents of this species are water-soluble, and boiling and then discarding the cooking water at least partly detoxifies A. muscaria.[60] Drying may increase potency, as the process facilitates the conversion of ibotenic acid to the more potent muscimol.[61] According to some sources, once detoxified, the mushroom becomes edible.[62][63]

Pharmacology[edit]

Muscarine, discovered in 1869,[64] was long thought to be the active hallucinogenic agent in A. muscaria. Muscarine binds with muscarinic acetylcholine receptors leading to the excitation of neurons bearing these receptors. The levels of muscarine in Amanita muscaria are minute when compared with other poisonous fungi[65] such as Inocybe erubescens, the small white Clitocybe species C. dealbata and C. rivulosa. The level of muscarine in A. muscaria is too low to play a role in the symptoms of poisoning.[66]

The major toxins involved in A. muscaria poisoning are muscimol (3-hydroxy-5-aminomethyl-1-isoxazole, an unsaturated cyclic hydroxamic acid) and the related amino acid ibotenic acid. Muscimol is the product of the decarboxylation (usually by drying) of ibotenic acid. Muscimol and ibotenic acid were discovered in the mid-20th century.[67][68] Researchers in England,[69] Japan,[70] and Switzerland[68] showed that the effects produced were due mainly to ibotenic acid and muscimol, not muscarine.[13][67] These toxins are not distributed uniformly in the mushroom. Most are detected in the cap of the fruit, a moderate amount in the base, with the smallest amount in the stalk.[71][72] Quite rapidly, between 20 and 90 minutes after ingestion, a substantial fraction of ibotenic acid is excreted unmetabolised in the urine of the consumer. Almost no muscimol is excreted when pure ibotenic acid is eaten, but muscimol is detectable in the urine after eating A. muscaria, which contains both ibotenic acid and muscimol.[50]

Ibotenic acid and muscimol are structurally related to each other and to two major neurotransmitters of the central nervous system: glutamic acid and GABA respectively. Ibotenic acid and muscimol act like these neurotransmitters, muscimol being a potent GABAAagonist, while ibotenic acid is an agonist of NMDA glutamate receptors and certain metabotropic glutamate receptors[73] which are involved in the control of neuronal activity. It is these interactions which are thought to cause the psychoactive effects found in intoxication.[15][51]

Muscazone is another compound that has more recently been isolated from European specimens of the fly agaric. It is a product of the breakdown of ibotenic acid by ultra-violet radiation.[74] Muscazone is of minor pharmacological activity compared with the other agents.[15]Amanita muscaria and related species are known as effective bioaccumulators of vanadium; some species concentrate vanadium to levels of up to 400 times those typically found in plants.[75] Vanadium is present in fruit-bodies as an organometallic compound called amavadine.[75] The biological importance of the accumulation process is unknown.[76]

Symptoms[edit]

Fly agarics are known for the unpredictability of their effects. Depending on habitat and the amount ingested per body weight, effects can range from nausea and twitching to drowsiness, cholinergic crisis-like effects (low blood pressure, sweating and salivation), auditory and visual distortions, mood changes, euphoria, relaxation, ataxia, and loss of equilibrium.[45][46][51][54]

In cases of serious poisoning the mushroom causes delirium, somewhat similar in effect to anticholinergic poisoning (such as that caused by Datura stramonium), characterised by bouts of marked agitation with confusion, hallucinations, and irritability followed by periods of central nervous system depression. Seizures and coma may also occur in severe poisonings.[46][51] Symptoms typically appear after around 30 to 90 minutes and peak within three hours, but certain effects can last for several days.[48][50] In the majority of cases recovery is complete within 12 to 24 hours.[60] The effect is highly variable between individuals, with similar doses potentially causing quite different reactions.[45][50][77] Some people suffering intoxication have exhibited headaches up to ten hours afterwards.[50]Retrograde amnesia and somnolence can result following recovery.[51]

Treatment[edit]

Medical attention should be sought in cases of suspected poisoning. If the delay between ingestion and treatment is less than four hours, activated charcoal is given. Gastric lavage can be considered if the patient presents within one hour of ingestion.[78] Inducing vomiting with syrup of ipecac is no longer recommended in any poisoning situations.[79]

There is no antidote, and supportive care is the mainstay of further treatment for intoxication. Though sometimes referred to as a deliriant and while muscarine was first isolated from A. muscaria and as such is its namesake, muscimol does not have action, either as an agonist or antagonist, at the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor site, and therefore atropine or physostigmine as an antidote is not recommended.[80] If a patient is delirious or agitated, this can usually be treated by reassurance and, if necessary, physical restraints. A benzodiazepine such as diazepam or lorazepam can be used to control combativeness, agitation, muscular overactivity, and seizures.[45] Only small doses should be used, as they may worsen the respiratory depressant effects of muscimol.[81] Recurrent vomiting is rare, but if present may lead to fluid and electrolyte imbalances; intravenous rehydration or electrolyte replacement may be required.[51][82] Serious cases may develop loss of consciousness or coma, and may need intubation and artificial ventilation.[46][83]Hemodialysis can remove the toxins, although this intervention is generally considered unnecessary.[60] With modern medical treatment the prognosis is typically good following supportive treatment.[56][60]

Psychoactive use[edit]

The wide range of psychoactive effects have been variously described as depressant, sedative-hypnotic, psychedelic, dissociative, and or deliriant; paradoxical effects such as stimulation may occur however. Perceptual phenomena such as synesthesia, macropsia, and micropsia may occur; the latter two effects may occur simultaneously and or alternatingly as part of Alice in Wonderland syndrome, collectively known as dysmetropsia, along with related distortions pelopsia and teleopsia. Some users report lucid dreaming under the influence of its hypnotic effects. Unlike Psilocybe cubensis, A. muscaria cannot be commercially cultivated, due to its mycorrhizal relationship with the roots of pine trees. However, following the outlawing of psilocybin mushrooms in the United Kingdom in 2006, the sale of the still legal A. muscaria began increasing.[84]:17

Professor Marija Gimbutas, a renowned Lithuanian historian, reported to R. Gordon Wasson on the use of this mushroom in Lithuania. In remote areas of LithuaniaAmanita muscaria has been consumed at wedding feasts, in which mushrooms were mixed with vodka. The professor also reported that the Lithuanians used to export A. muscaria to the Lapps in the Far North for use in shamanic rituals. The Lithuanian festivities are the only report that Wasson received of ingestion of fly agaric for religious use in Eastern Europe.[85]:43-44

Siberia[edit]

Amanita muscaria was widely used as an entheogen by many of the indigenous peoples of Siberia. Its use was known among almost all of the Uralic-speaking peoples of western Siberia and the Paleosiberian-speaking peoples of the Russian Far East. There are only isolated reports of A. muscaria use among the Tungusic and Turkic peoples of central Siberia and it is believed that on the whole entheogenic use of A. muscaria was not practised by these peoples.[86] In western Siberia, the use of A. muscaria was restricted to shamans, who used it as an alternative method of achieving a trance state. (Normally, Siberian shamans achieve trance by prolonged drumming and dancing.) In eastern Siberia, A. muscaria was used by both shamans and laypeople alike, and was used recreationally as well as religiously.[86] In eastern Siberia, the shaman would take the mushrooms, and others would drink his urine.[5]:161 This urine, still containing psychoactive elements, may be more potent than the A. muscaria mushrooms with fewer negative effects such as sweating and twitching, suggesting that the initial user may act as a screening filter for other components in the mushroom.[87]

The Koryak of eastern Siberia have a story about the fly agaric (wapaq) which enabled Big Raven to carry a whale to its home. In the story, the deity Vahiyinin ("Existence") spat onto earth, and his spittle became the wapaq, and his saliva becomes the warts. After experiencing the power of the wapaq, Raven was so exhilarated that he told it to grow forever on earth so his children, the people, could learn from it.[88] Among the Koryaks, one report said that the poor would consume the urine of the wealthy, who could afford to buy the mushrooms.[5]:234–35

Other reports of use[edit]

The Finnish historian T. I. Itkonen mentions that A. muscaria was once used among the Sami people: sorcerers in Inari would consume fly agarics with seven spots.[5]:279 In 1979, Said Gholam Mochtar and Hartmut Geerken published an article in which they claim to have discovered a tradition of medicinal and recreational use of this mushroom among a Parachi-speaking group in Afghanistan.[89] There are also unconfirmed reports of religious use of A. muscaria among two Subarctic Native American tribes. Ojibwa ethnobotanist Keewaydinoquay Peschel reported its use among her people, where it was known as the miskwedo.[90][91] This information was enthusiastically received by Wasson, although evidence from other sources was lacking.[92] There is also one account of a Euro-American who claims to have been initiated into traditional Tlicho use of Amanita muscaria.[93]

Vikings[edit]

The notion that Vikings used A. muscaria to produce their berserker rages was first suggested by the Swedish professor Samuel Ödmann in 1784.[94] Ödmann based his theories on reports about the use of fly agaric among Siberian shamans. The notion has become widespread since the 19th century, but no contemporary sources mention this use or anything similar in their description of berserkers. Muscimol is generally a mild relaxant, but it can create a range of different reactions within a group of people.[95] It is possible that it could make a person angry, or cause them to be "very jolly or sad, jump about, dance, sing or give way to great fright".[95]

Fly trap[edit]

Amanita muscaria is traditionally used for catching flies possibly due to its content of ibotenic acid and muscimol. Recently, an analysis of nine different methods for preparing A. muscaria for catching flies in Slovenia have shown that the release of ibotenic acid and muscimol did not depend on the solvent (milk or water) and that thermal and mechanical processing led to faster extraction of ibotenic acid and muscimol.[96]

In religion[edit]

Soma[edit]

See also: Botanical identity of Soma-Haoma

In 1968, R. Gordon Wasson proposed that A. muscaria was the Soma talked about in the Rig Veda of India,[5]:10 a claim which received widespread publicity and popular support at the time.[97] He noted that descriptions of Soma omitted any description of roots, stems or seeds, which suggested a mushroom,[5]:18 and used the adjective hári "dazzling" or "flaming" which the author interprets as meaning red.[5]:36–37 One line described men urinating Soma; this recalled the practice of recycling urine in Siberia. Soma is mentioned as coming "from the mountains", which Wasson interpreted as the mushroom having been brought in with the Aryan invaders from the north.[5]:22–24 Indian scholars Santosh Kumar Dash and Sachinanda Padhy pointed out that both eating of mushrooms and drinking of urine were proscribed, using as a source the Manusmṛti.[98] In 1971, Vedic scholar John Brough from Cambridge University rejected Wasson's theory and noted that the language was too vague to determine a description of Soma.[99] In his 1976 survey, Hallucinogens and Culture, anthropologist Peter T. Furst evaluated the evidence for and against the identification of the fly agaric mushroom as the Vedic Soma, concluding cautiously in its favour.[100]

Christianity[edit]

Philologist, archeologist, and Dead Sea Scrolls scholar John Marco Allegro postulated that early Christian theology was derived from a fertility cult revolving around the entheogenic consumption of A. muscaria in his 1970 book The Sacred Mushroom and the Cross,[101] but his theory has found little support by scholars outside the field of ethnomycology. The book was roundly discredited by academics and theologians, including Sir Godfrey Driver, Emeritus Professor of Semitic Philology at Oxford University, and Henry Chadwick, the Dean of Christ Church, Oxford.[102] Christian author John C. King wrote a detailed rebuttal of Allegro's theory in the 1970 book A Christian View of the Mushroom Myth; he notes that neither fly agarics nor their host trees are found in the Middle East, even though cedars and pines are found there, and highlights the tenuous nature of the links between biblical and Sumerian names coined by Allegro. He concludes that if the theory were true, the use of the mushroom must have been "the best kept secret in the world" as it was so well concealed for two thousand years.[103][104]

Culinary use[edit]

The toxins in A. muscaria are water-soluble. When sliced thinly, or finely diced and boiled in plentiful water until thoroughly cooked, it seems to be detoxified.[62] Although its consumption as a food has never been widespread,[105] the consumption of detoxified A. muscaria has been practiced in some parts of Europe (notably by Russian settlers in Siberia) since at least the 19th century, and likely earlier. The German physician and naturalist Georg Heinrich von Langsdorff wrote the earliest published account on how to detoxify this mushroom in 1823. In the late 19th century, the French physician Félix Archimède Pouchet was a populariser and advocate of A. muscaria consumption, comparing it to manioc, an important food source in tropical South America that must be detoxified before consumption.[62]

Use of this mushroom as a food source also seems to have existed in North America. A classic description of this use of A. muscaria by an African-American mushroom seller in Washington, D.C., in the late 19th century is described by American botanist Frederick Vernon Coville. In this case, the mushroom, after parboiling, and soaking in vinegar, is made into a mushroom sauce for steak.[106] It is also consumed as a food in parts of Japan. The most well-known current use as an edible mushroom is in Nagano Prefecture, Japan. There, it is primarily salted and pickled.[107]

A 2008 paper by food historian William Rubel and mycologist David Arora gives a history of consumption of A. muscaria as a food and describes detoxification methods. They advocate that Amanita muscaria be described in field guides as an edible mushroom, though accompanied by a description on how to detoxify it. The authors state that the widespread descriptions in field guides of this mushroom as poisonous is a reflection of cultural bias, as several other popular edible species, notably morels, are toxic unless properly cooked.[62]

Legal status[edit]

Main article: Legal status of psychoactive Amanita mushrooms

Cultural depictions[edit]

The red-and-white spotted toadstool is a common image in many aspects of popular culture.[29] Garden ornaments and children's picture books depicting gnomes and fairies, such as the Smurfs, often show fly agarics used as seats, or homes.[29][109] Fly agarics have been featured in paintings since the Renaissance,[110] albeit in a subtle manner. In the Victorian era they became more visible, becoming the main topic of some fairy paintings.[111] Two of the most famous uses of the mushroom are in the video game series Super Mario Bros. (specifically two of the power-up items and the platforms in several stages),[112] and the dancing mushroom sequence in the 1940 Disney film Fantasia.[113]

Literature[edit]

An account of the journeys of Philip von Strahlenberg to Siberia and his descriptions of the use of the mukhomor there was published in English in 1736. The drinking of urine of those who had consumed the mushroom was commented on by Anglo-Irish writer Oliver Goldsmith in his widely read 1762 novel, Citizen of the World.[116]

Showing the partial veil under the cap dropping away to form a ring around the stipe
Amanita muscaria var. formosa is now a synonym for Amanita muscaria var. guessowii.[3]
Cross section of fruiting body, showing pigment under skin and free gills
Mature. The white spots may wash off with heavy rainfall
Muscimol, the principal psychoactive constituent of A. muscaria
Photographed in Mount Lofty Botanic Gardens, Adelaide Hills, South Australia
Mosaic of red mushrooms, found in the Christian Basilica of Aquileia in northern Italy, dating to before 330 AD
Jose de Creeft's sculpture Alice in Wonderland in Eastern Central Park, New York. Alice sits on a mushroom, inviting children to climb up and join her. The mushroom in the sculpture is not a faithfully reproduced Amanita muscaria; the reference within Lewis Carroll's original literary work upon which the sculpture is based is often discussed.[114][115]

One thought on “Agaric Acid Analysis Essay

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *